Відео

That's true, they didn't sleep well on the moon because they didn't go to the moon at all, and no one can because it's made of plasma. FYI I hear that they haven't slept since Capricorn One

I love these videos but I can’t read the comments, the fact that we live in such a technologically advanced world and people don’t believe we’re capable of going to the Moon is dumbfounding, still this was well explained and actually more common sense than you’d think, thanks Amy :)

I was 5, when Mom showed us the funeral of the guys, that passed in Apollo 204...Apollo 1.

I was 7 when Neil and Buzz landed! Thanks so much for your interest in the space program back then, Amy!

Something else to point out is that once a rocket reaches outer space, it no longer needs fuel to keep going. Within the vacuum of space (without friction), the object will continue to travel in the same direction and at the same speed. At this point, more fuel can be burned to increase the speed or to change it's direction. I'm assuming that there is no diminishing returns when it comes to reaching higher speeds (i.e., you can continue to gain speed at the same rate regardless of current speed), but then it becomes a matter of needing fuel to also slow down once approaching the destination.

The original seven astronauts were chosen and the race to space and the creation of NASA were all done under Eisenhower, not Kennedy.

A fabulous explanation! I grew up in the 1960’s so I remember part of the Mercury program, all of Gemini and all of Apollo. I knew about the guillotine that was used to separate the ascent stage from the descent stage on the LEM, yeah, to me it’s still The Lunar Excursion Module Ha! Ha! But I didn’t know that one was used to cut the umbilicals between the CM & SM. Fascinating! I always wondered where the interconnects were between the CM & SM. Thanks to your explanation, I now know what that angled part that was on the side of the CM / SM stack was for. I can’t believe that I never knew that. Thanks for the information! Love your video’s. It’s great to hear from someone so young who knows so much about our early space program. Looking forward to your next video! Be Well!

Was the decision to leave the rendezvous radar on made in consultation with Houston? I thought I read somewhere that it was a decision made by the crew (Buzz specifically) and wasn't actually part of the planned procedures. From what you said, Houston was aware of it, but didn't believe that it was generating interrupts on the AGC. Was the rendezvous radar turned off for future missions?

Did you know? Ariane 2/3 Rocket use Milkstool for ELA-2 pad.

TTTT that wasn't the first explanation that came to mind. The crews were all balls for over 20 years.

I find you site really worthless you jump all over the place, guess it because you don’t know what the hell you are talking about.

See the first chapter of Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein. He describes a one man re-entry pod that is more plausible than this.

John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his only son Jesus christ that whoever believes in him will not perish but have everlasting life

The ascend video has already been proven to be fake, when you slow down the video, clearly you can see the oscillation like a pendulum, like it is being lifted by cable. If you see a load being lifted by a tall crane at the construction site of a tall skyscraper, the load being lifted has some oscillation while being lifted. This has already been proven and it is visible to those who are willing to remove their blindfolds. Why do you think NASA uses a bimbo to teach you sheep,the propaganda? You’re so dumb that the camera filming the ascent follows the ascend and zooms in just like a handheld but the bimbo would tell you it was a remote control camera. But the technology didn’t exist in 1969

Texas twang. Zodiac derivative. Gemin-eye . Mind you..wee-hi-cul, sodder, nu-cu-lar Nasa scientists say Gemin-eye because they pronounce it. Scientists at NASA also use the metric system... No wonder the space program is contracted out to private enterprise :)

I really appreciate your comment about humans going to Mars because we've destroyed our own planet. Spot on! Even if we figure out how to live on Mars and set up a colony ... what then? Really, how many people could we actually transport to Mars to live? A hundred? A thousand? While human space exploration is romantic to think about, it's just not realistic to think humans will be able to survive anywhere but Earth. And now you have scientists who talk about stars "just 10 light years away." It used to be "10 LIGHT YEARS AWAY!!" Now they want it to sound like it's right around the corner. How about we spend the money to take care of THIS planet? How about we figure out how to NOT destroy it?

Way too funny! I'm surprised that you didn't choke on your own 'BS'. But, your 'titan' example disproves your own statement. I can quite clearly see a flame and what you completely overlook, is that all hypergolic engines start with a cloud of orange smoke -which you can see billowing out behind that titan. If you go look at any of the other hypergolic engine tests, you will see that smoke. There is even footage of the town nearby to engine test facility being evacuated - lots of orange smoke from an oxidant leak. So sorry, you should expect to see flame from the launch. And, while we're at it. If you 'freeze-frame' that lift-off, just after the module clears that mouyntain in the background, you will notice that the ridge line is NOT distorted. If there is a rocket engine operating, the exhaust gas WOULD, by its very nature, distort the view. That ridge line is a clear as a bell. There is no rocket operating. And finall7y, look closely at the framework that remains after the launch. Where are the fuel tanks and the rocket engine? I'm sure they didn't take them back to earth! I don't think you are very good at spotting fake!

The older B-52's used a similar cartridge to get their turbojet engines started in a hurry. The newer models have upgraded turbofan engines with internal starters, better economy, higher and can go longer between rebuilds due to their modern design.

good video

So you're saying there's enough fuel in that tiny rover to create enough push to break away from the moons gravity? No thanks. All you pretty much said was the fuel can't be seen.

LOL funny how people say the shuttle can fly like an airplane but it really glided down to Earth like a glider Because if it missed the runway it couldn’t turn on the jet engine and go around for another attempt for a landing. It had one shot to land.

Iam just here to learn and listen. Great channel!😎😍

Damn was some annoying noise. Hurt my ears. Didn’t sound like music

Thanks. Heard about this in flagrant podcast.

So pretty and proper. Definitely a score for the USA! 🙂

Watch Scott Manley

Apollo 1 didnt have to happen the 2 space shuttles a little different

Talked to a person who worked on the US X-15 rocket plane program (1959-1968). Speaking of his time with the program, he told me how NASA considered putting the X-15 into orbit, but none of their pilots could fly the re-entry profile on the simulator without burning up. A non pilot member of the program asked if he could try re entry on the simulator, and they let him. He succeeded, and was able to repeat the manuever again and again. Everyone wanted to know how he was able to succeed where others could not. Simple, he said, he watched the temperature guage. If the X-15 got too hot, he pulled up; when it cooled down he let the plane descend. He did this over and over, and showed that winged reentry from orbit was possible. The X-15's glide ratio was about 4 to 1. Constructed of inconel X alloy. An ablative coating was tried on the X-15, but was found to be unsatisfactory, and actually interferred with the plane's natural ability to disapate heat. Joe Engle flew both the X-15 and commanded STS-2, which was Columbia’s second orbital test. He hand-flew the shuttle from orbit to landing, which was the first and only time a winged aerospace vehicle was flown manually from orbit through landing. Thank you for your videos and please keep up the good work.

I miss this channel.

And buran means blizzard or snowstorm

One of the hangers with a couple of the burans collapsed recently and destroyed one and killed a few people, also the C.I.A conducted a deception operation when it was being built where they gave the Soviet union false information about the heat shield that is one of the reasons it only flew once.

I mean this is the show that had space shuttles flying to the moon so I wouldn’t take it too seriously

Why did you stop! You had such a following and good thing going!

🤣🤣🤣 this gave me a good laugh

Really

Manned Mars mission is possible with existing technology. Expensive, and would require considerable long term logistical and financial support. Beyond Mars manned missions are impractical with existing tech. No reason Congress can't fund a manned mission to Mars (and the Moon) AND further unmanned programs to the other destinations in the solar system.

They used to say things like robut back then instead of robot too. 🤔🤷‍♂️

Tell us about Deke Slayton. Why he did not fly with Mercury or Gemini. Why he was cleared to go to the moon.

True perhaps now we can parachute the cabin down but still what if

I pray noone dies on space X because of similar mistakes.

In the end it was too cold to launch it wasn't designed for 32° but 54°+ should of Abort but sadly they did not 😢

I was a fan of NASA from age 5(1962) and love SPACEX now. I was not a fan of the shuttle

Sexuality sells the space lies I guess? Regurgitating propaganda doesn't make a sexy women an authority on true science or history. Just makes her an authority on propaganda.

Where did they poop?

Gemini 👁 Gemin 👁 . Everyone said Gemenaye. Aye captain Gemini

7 years later, still a great breakdown

Are there videos on propellers in space?

If a moon bird seen a lunar worm crawling on the surface, it may be consumed for supper!

I believe they’re real they had dogs and monkeys die going up there I’m sure humans have too!